“We are disturbed not by things, but by the views we take of them.”
There’s a line from Epictetus that’s followed me around for years:
“We are disturbed not by things, but by the views we take of them.”
For a long time, that sentence felt like a superpower.
If my suffering wasn’t really about events, but about how I viewed them, then maybe I could think my way out of pain. Maybe, if I just trained my mind hard enough, I could be unshakeable.
Spoiler: I did become harder to shake.
I also became harder to reach.
Stoicism helped me survive.
It also helped me build armour I didn’t know how to take off.
This is a story about Stoicism, “facts vs stories,” what therapy gave me that philosophy alone didn’t, and how I’m learning to use all of it more gently now—like tools in a kit instead of weapons I turn on myself.
How Stoicism First Helped Me
I’m not a Stoic scholar, just a very human reader who was desperate for something that made life make sense.
The pieces that hooked me were simple:
- There are things I can control, and things I can’t.
- The only real control I have is over my own thoughts, choices, and actions.
- External events are not “good” or “bad” by themselves; it’s the judgment I attach to them that stings.
- If I can change my judgment, I can suffer less.
In messy real life, this sounded like:
- “I can’t control what other people do, only how I respond.”
- “This setback isn’t a catastrophe, it’s an obstacle to work with.”
- “Pain is inevitable; staying stuck in it is optional.”
There’s real wisdom there. Stoicism gave me:
- Language for boundaries with the world
- A way to not be completely hijacked by every crisis
- A sense of dignity when everything else felt unstable
It helped me function when my inner world was chaotic.
But then something subtle happened.
The more I leaned on Stoicism, the more it slid from:
“I have some choice in how I respond”
into:
“If I’m hurting, it’s because I’m doing it wrong.”
And that’s where the armour started welding itself on.
When Stoicism Becomes Armour
On paper, Stoicism talks about virtue, wisdom, courage, justice, temperance.
In my head, it became something else:
- Don’t be too emotional.
- Don’t show that you’re hurt.
- Don’t complain.
- Don’t “indulge” in sadness.
- Accept what is. Always.
When people hurt me, my default became:
- “Well, I can’t control them. I just have to accept it.”
- “This is just my interpretation. If I were stronger, this wouldn’t bother me.”
- “Other people have it worse. Stop making a big deal out of nothing.”
On the surface, that looked like resilience.
Inside, it was more like abandonment—of myself.
Because sometimes what’s happening isn’t okay.
Sometimes your emotional reaction isn’t a faulty “story,” it’s a nervous system screaming, “This is not safe. This is not fair. This is too much.”
Stoicism helped me tolerate what maybe shouldn’t have been tolerated.
It helped me endure instead of leave.
It helped me rationalize instead of feel.
I don’t think Stoicism caused that on its own.
But the way I used it became:
“If I’m disturbed, the problem must be my perception. Not the situation.”
That’s armour. Thick, polished, philosophical armour.
And eventually, it got too heavy.
Enter Therapy: Facts vs Stories
Therapy didn’t arrive in my life as a lightning bolt. It was more like exhaustion finally raising a hand and saying, “We can’t keep doing it this way.”
One of the most powerful ideas I met there was the distinction between facts and stories.
In cognitive-behavioural terms:
- Facts are what actually happened
- Stories are the meanings my mind rapidly glued onto those facts
For example:
Fact:
Someone important to me reads my message and doesn’t reply all day.
Stories my brain offers:
- “They’re mad at me.”
- “I’m too much.”
- “I said something wrong.”
- “They’re pulling away.”
- “People always leave.”
The emotion that follows isn’t just from the fact (no reply).
It’s from the story I told about what that silence meant.
CBT, narrative therapy, and mindfulness all, in their own ways, circle this idea:
- There’s raw reality.
- Then there’s the narrative we layer over it.
- That narrative is powerful—but it’s not the only possible one.
Therapists sometimes say things like:
“Can we separate what we know from what we’re imagining?”
“What actually happened?”
“What’s the story you’re telling yourself about what happened?”
That language did something important for me:
It gently pried my fingers off the idea that my first thought was the truth.
Stoicism and Therapy: Same Insight, Different Tone
Here’s the interesting part:
The Epictetus quote and the facts-vs-stories idea are… cousins.
“We are disturbed not by things, but by the views we take of them.”
and
“It’s not just the event; it’s the narrative we attach to it.”
are pointing to a similar truth.
But therapy added nuances Stoicism, as I practiced it, was missing:
- Feelings aren’t the enemy.
- Yes, my interpretation matters.
- But my pain is also information, not a moral failing.
- Not all stories are “bad.”
- Some stories are protective, born from old wounds.
- Some stories are invitations to set boundaries.
- Some stories point to needs I’ve been ignoring.
- We don’t question stories to shut feelings down.
- We question them to understand ourselves better.
- And to choose responses that are kinder to us.
Said differently:
- My Stoic side knew: “My view matters.”
- Therapy added: “And my feelings matter too.”
That combination was… unsettling at first.
Because if my feelings matter, I can’t just philosophize them away. I have to listen.
How All of This Impacted Me
Here’s what it looked like on the inside.
Before: Stoic Armour
- Something hurt → I told myself to accept it.
- Someone crossed a line → I reframed it until it sounded reasonable.
- I felt lonely, scared, sad → I lectured myself on perspective and gratitude.
- I took pride in “handling” more than I probably should.
My inner voice was very reasonable and very cold.
Then: Therapy + Facts vs Stories
- I started actually naming what happened:
- “They cancelled again.”
- “I’m alone tonight.”
- “That comment was sharp.”
- I started separating:
- Fact: “They haven’t replied.”
- Story: “I don’t matter to them.”
- I started noticing how fast my brain jumped to worst-case meanings.
And slowly:
- I stopped using Stoic ideas as a hammer against my own feelings.
- I started letting both things be true:
- “This is the story my brain is telling.”
- “This still hurts—even if the story isn’t fully accurate.”
Now: Learning to Soften
I still value Stoicism.
But I no longer want it to be my only instrument.
These days, I try to:
- Use Stoicism to remember what I can’t control
- Use facts-vs-stories to see how I’m interpreting things
- Use compassion to decide what I actually need
Sometimes that need is acceptance.
Sometimes it’s a boundary.
Sometimes it’s grief.
Sometimes it’s leaving.
Sometimes it’s asking for reassurance instead of pretending I’m fine.
It’s messy. It’s not very Stoic in the classical sense.
But it feels more human.
A Simple Practice: Facts, Stories, and Softening
If any of this resonates with you, here’s a practice I’m trying to build into my own life.
You can use it in a quiet moment when something stings.
1. Start with the Fact
Ask yourself:
“If a camera were recording this, what would it see and hear?”
Write that down or say it plainly, without adjectives.
- “They walked out of the room.”
- “My message hasn’t been answered in 6 hours.”
- “They raised their voice and said, ‘This is your fault.’”
- “I ate dinner alone.”
That’s the fact.
2. Name the Story
Now ask:
“What story is my mind telling about this?”
Be honest. Let it sound as dramatic as it feels:
- “They hate me.”
- “I’m a burden.”
- “I always mess things up.”
- “I’m unlovable.”
- “People eventually get tired of me.”
That’s the story.
3. Notice the Feeling
Then:
“How does that story make me feel in my body?”
- Tight chest?
- Heavy stomach?
- Heat in your face?
- A collapse in your shoulders?
This part is key: you’re not arguing with your feelings. You’re acknowledging them.
4. Apply a Gentle Stoic Lens
Now, in a kinder voice, try the Epictetus move:
“Is this the only possible view I can take of this?”
“If someone loved me and saw this, how might they see it?”
Not to erase your story. Just to add options:
- “They haven’t replied… and they might be overwhelmed today.”
- “I feel like a burden… and I also know I’m trying really hard.”
- “They snapped at me… and that says something about where they are too.”
5. Ask: “What Do I Need Right Now?”
Finally:
“Given the fact, and given how I feel, what do I need?”
Maybe it’s:
- A boundary
- A conversation
- A walk
- A cry
- A plan
- Rest
- To talk to someone safe
- Or yes, sometimes… to accept what I can’t change
This is where Stoicism and therapy meet, for me:
- Stoicism reminds me: “I can’t control them.”
- Therapy reminds me: “But I’m still allowed to care that this hurts.”
- Softening reminds me: “I don’t have to go through this as an enemy of my own heart.”
Using These as Tools, Not Tests
I used to treat Stoicism like an exam:
- Real Stoics don’t break.
- Real Stoics don’t complain.
- Real Stoics don’t need.
Now I’m trying to treat Stoicism, facts-vs-stories, CBT-style thinking… like tools scattered on a workbench.
Some days I need the Stoic wrench:
- “Okay, I genuinely cannot control this outcome. I can only show up how I want to.”
Some days I need the therapy screwdriver:
- “Okay, my brain is telling me a story that might not be fully true.”
Some days I need something else entirely:
- A hug.
- A day off.
- A boundary.
- A goodbye.
The biggest shift?
I no longer want any philosophy or framework to be a reason to ignore my own pain.
If Stoicism helps you show up with courage and clarity—beautiful.
If facts-vs-stories helps you loosen the grip of old narratives—also beautiful.
But if any of it becomes armour you can’t take off…
you’re allowed to put it down for a while.
You’re allowed to be a human first and a Stoic second.

